Do Antiborrelial Antibodies Suggest Lyme Disease in Cuba?

clinical strains and transformants had bands of β-lactamase activity with an alkaline pI of 7.6 and 5.4. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the 26 clinical isolates was positive for blaCTX-M and blaTEM (7). The 26 strains of E. coli had the same profile by repetitive-element PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, while unrelated control strains had very different profiles. Sequencing in strains isolated from four of the patients identified a CTX-M-15 β-lactamase and a TEM-1 β-lactamase. The four strains were related to the phylogenetic group B2 and produced the iutA (ferric aerobactin receptor), YuA (Yersinia siderophore receptor), and fimH (type I fimbriae) virulence factors (8). Incidence of colonization or infection by the culprit strain was 34.3% (12 of 35 patients) within the initial 4-month period and 55.3% (26 of 47 patients) over a 1-year period. Intensified hygienic procedures implemented in January 2002 contributed to a decrease in the number of cases in February only; since then, a regular increase of new cases extended the outbreak and caused problems with controlling it. All urinary tract infections were successfully treated with a 15-day course of trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole; however, reinfection occurred in some. Neither incontinence (p = 0.35), dementia (p = 0.22), nor previous antibiotic treatment (amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones [p = 1.00, 0.30, 0.12, 0.52, respectively]) appeared to be risk factors for infection or colonization in our study, but the number of patients is too small to reach a conclusion. However, patients that were infected or colonized had greater functional impairment, especially incontinence and dementia. Nonambulatory status, decubitus ulcers, and feeding tubes were not risk factors for acquiring ESBL-producing E. coli in our study. The outbreak has not been controlled: 13 patients have persistent digestive-tract colonization. Difficulties encountered in controlling such outbreaks may be explained by several factors. Patients cannot be easily isolated in long-term care facilities. Strict isolation and limitation of activity and mobility cannot always be applied because of their impact on social activities.